Inkscape, too, does a good job with opening documents created elsewhere, and may be a more intuitive choice if your document is heavy on graphics. If the PDF was created from a scan, then you'll only have images of text and not editable text. If you haven't installed the fonts used in the PDF, then the flow of text could change due to font substitution. There are caveats to this, because of the flexibility of the PDF format. LibreOffice Draw does a fantastic job of editing PDF files, giving you full access to the text and images. That's not always possible, though, and luckily there are some great tools to make all manner of edits possible. The authoritative answer nobody ever wants is: don't edit PDFs, edit the source and then export a new PDF. For some people, editing a PDF means changing a few words or a swapping out an old image for a new one, while for others it means altering metadata such as bookmarks, and for still others it means manipulating page order or adjusting print resolution. However, there are several other solutions, including Docbook, Sphinx, and LaTeX. Its ability to translate text formats is staggering, so it's probably all you really need. Everyone has their favourite, but probably the most popular is Pandoc, which takes nearly any format of document and translates it to nearly any other format. If you don't need fancy graphical interfaces, you can also generate PDFs through plain text with a few handy terminal commands. Scribus, Inkscape, and GIMP all support native PDF export, too, so no matter what kind of document you need to make - a complex layout, formatted text, vector or raster image, or some combination - there's an open source application that meets your needs.įor practically every other application, the CUPS printing system does an excellent job of outputting documents as PDF, because printers and PDFs both rely on PostScript to represent data on page (whether the page is digital or physical). Personally, LibreOffice's export functionality ends up being the source of 95% of the PDFs I create that weren't built for me by a web application. All of these have the ability to complete PDF forms, view and make comments, search for text, select text, and so on.įor a generic, simple, and fast PDF reader, try xpdf. KDE's Okular serves as the PDF reader for the Plasma Desktop.

Both Firefox and Chromium, the open source version of Google's Chrome browser, come bundled with in-browser PDF readers, so an external plugin is no longer necessary for most users.įor downloaded files, users of GNOME-based Linux distributions have Evince (or Atril on the GNOME 2 fork, MATE), a powerful PDF reader that handles most documents quickly and with ease. Evince has a Windows port as well, although Windows users may also want to check out the GPLv3-licensed SumatraPDF as an alternative. Reading PDFsįor reading PDFs, these days many people get by without having to use an external application at all. Since PDF files are used in so many different situations for so many different kinds of purposes, you may need to shop around to find the open source alternative to Adobe Acrobat that meets your exact needs. And for Linux users like me, a proprietary application that only runs on Windows or Mac isn't an option anyway. But today, there are numerous open source PDF applications which have chipped away at this market dominance.

And, love it or hate it, PDF, the ' portable document format,' seems to be the go-to format for creating and sharing print-ready files, as well as archiving files that originated as print.įor years, the only name in the game for working with PDF documents was Adobe Acrobat, whether in the form of their free reader edition or one of their paid editions for PDF creation and editing. Until the world moves a little further from paper, print-ready file formats will continue to permeate our digital landscape as well. And I do occasionally admit to reading a paper book, sending a postcard, or (gasp) printing something off to give to someone else. Instead, we've managed to land in an intermediate state of not paperless, but less paper.īetween a trusty scanner, email and various other communication tools, and getting really good at organizing my digital archives, I'm not totally unhappy with where we are today. I can't be the only person who imagined the office of the future, free from the confines of the eight and a half by eleven sheet (or A4, for my international friends), would have long since arrived. Aren't we supposed to be living in a paperless world by now?

Adobe captivate open source alternative